Burke Tae Kwon Do Instructor Indicted for Indecent Liberties with Minor, Child Pornography
Indictment includes four counts of indecent liberties with a minor and three counts of possession of child pornography.
Update 5 p.m. May 23
Patch reviewed the search warrants, which reveal the instructor tied sex to the victims' sports goals. A follow-up story was published at 5 p.m.
_______
A tae kwon do instructor at Burke's Phan University of Martial Arts was indicted on seven felony charges for his alleged inappropriate contact with minors, West Springfield District police said Wednesday morning. Officers say they were contacted by the first victim in June 2011. During the course of their investigation, a second victim was discovered.
On Monday, the instructor, Quyen Vinh Phan Le, 38, of Springfield, was indicted on four counts of indecent liberties with a minor by someone in a custodial or supervisory relationship and three counts of possession of child pornography. He was arraigned on those charges on Tuesday.
Detectives determined the tae kwon do instructor reportedly had inappropriate sexual contact with the first victim several times between May 2003 and January 2005. The victim was under 18 years of age when the incidents occurred.
The suspect reportedly had inappropriate sexual contact with the second victim in late 2008. She was under 18 years of age at the time. These incidents are alleged to have occurred at the Phan University of Martial Arts and at the suspect’s home.
In October 2011, detectives served several search warrants and recovered additional evidence.
Detectives are not aware of any other victims. However, if anyone has any additional information to provide, they are asked to contact Crime Solvers by phone at 1-866-411-TIPS/8477, e-mail at www.fairfaxcrimesolvers.org or text “TIP187” plus your message to CRIMES/274637 or call Fairfax County Police at 703-691-2131.
BlooBayoo
12:21 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Weren't they just voted best martial arts studio in Burke?
Also, concerning is that the first victim reported her complaint a year ago and the public was just notified.
Patricia Freeman
12:26 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Nellie, this is creepy. Hope Derek was not attending any of this stuff!
Trish
Rachel Lindsey
12:29 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I think it's interesting that within this article there is a link to a 5-start review of the studio, still posted with no highly profiled caveat.
ree
1:21 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Why? It's not like he allegedly had inappropriate relationships with everyone who walked in the door. Moreover he's probably on best behaviour now since being charged. He is also innocent until proven guilty.
Nellie
2:01 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Who care that he is on his best behavior....he should never have had inappropriate relations with a minor period
ree
2:51 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
No doubt, he shouldn't have done it, if he did it (innocent until proven guilty). However this is a lot more common than you might think. And I mean a WHOLE LOT more common--most of the time the police never get involved. It really behooves everyone to watch out and train their kids.
Susan Larson
7:43 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Burke Patch readers gave the ratings and reviews; they were not editorial decisions. We won't remove them, but readers are welcome to comment here and in the business listing in light of this new information. Thank you.
sirharley
12:37 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I was at the shopping center when they went into the studio in October - must have been 8 police taking things out, knew there was something up!!
A concerned parent
10:46 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Extremely shocked that he continued to have contact with kids and training them yesterday as well as "busienss as usual". onder after such a strong and severe charges, why is he still allowed to have contact with kids? Eventhough not guilty until proven, shall parents continue to put kids at risk while this case takes time to get resolved? Hope justice system sees something.
Chocki
1:09 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I doubt some parents know what is going on with the instructor because as far as I know parents are still taking their children to the academy. Most people don't watch or read news.
ree
4:34 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Because the charges are not as strong and severe as it might appear. If they were, the police would not let him have contact with children. Also, only one of the alleged incidents involved someone under 18. Yes I would put my kids there, but that's just me. There is potential danger anywhere and in my opinion he is not a significant threat.
BlooBayoo
5:38 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Apparently, BOTH of the alleged victims were under the age of 18.
One started attending the school at the age of 10 and the complaint alleges the sexual contact began at the age of 15. That sure sounds like grooming a victim to me.
What exactly is not severe as it might appear about indecent liberties with a minor and child pornography? Because they were teenage girls who appeared to have consented to the sexual contact at the age of 15? A grown man in a position of authority who manipulates young women into believing they are consenting IS strongly and severely a predator.
ree
6:28 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
BlooBayoo,
If you have misgivings about the school then you should not go there nor send your children. If you have other information which affects the public safety then you should share that with the police. Otherwise, the authorities have not felt he was significant danger and he has not been convicted of a crime.
Sorry but at this time it is not appropriate to respond further to your rhetorical questions about an innocent person.
A concerned parent
11:28 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Ree you need to wake up. Yes Mater Phan Le was perhaps very highl profiled athlete but what he is charged wIth tarnishes his reputation. I am sure that police or FBI are not visiting or collecting evidences or investigating beCause he is innocent. Yes it is yet to be provEn at the court of justice. Now knowing that someone is charges with improper contact with minors or owning tons of child pornography. Many pare
Nts trusted him and allowed him to instill disciplined lifestyle on kids. He broke trust. I am not sure knowing it all, a parent will hand over another kid for him to be in contact with. Sad to see
Such business being charged and hope justice prevails and if he found guilty, seNt behind the bar.
ree
12:01 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
A Concerned parent, you should reconsider before you say "I am sure that police or FBI are not visiting or collecting evidences or investigating beCause he is innocent." The courts decide guilt and innocence. When you say anyone who the police visit is guilty, it makes it harder to get a fair trial. Why not have patience?
Very many computers have pornography on them. Even if you delete it, the police will find it and charge you. My mother is 75 years old and when I work on her computer I find pornography four or five times. She did not put it there, and with research I discovered from whence it arrived without her knowledge. It can happen very easily.
A concerned parent
11:31 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Wish Burke patch and other news could publish what did court order? Can he be in contact with kids, travel with kids to tournaments and continue to coach?
Chocki
7:50 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
I think this is something that court by trial has to decide.
Justsayin
1:50 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Thank you Ree for believing in the court system, and hoping that this man is innocent. I too, hope he is. Mainly because I would hate to imagine what happened to the victims if he is guilty. This was obviously an ongoing investigation for a long time. Long enough for the police to find a second victim. stumbling across CHILD pornography doesn't help this man much either. Two accusations and more evidence is a lot of coincidence. So your mother having porn on her computer isn't really that bad, you're right. But having 3 counts of CHILD porn and 4 counts of indecent liberties with a minor, would make even a 100yr old look VERY guilty, and definitely suspicious enough for any smart parent to think twice about where to sen their kids.
Chocki
7:51 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
I completely agree with you Justsayin.
4runner
5:24 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
@ A concerned parent....You seem to know a lot about this place, information about classes, when they are going to move, where they are, providing information to everyone so as to pass judgment. I wouldn't be so surprised that you are a parent at that location. You're in a state of denial and need to follow your beliefs. If you feel that this isn't the place for you or your child then you should leave, whether our justice system prevails to proving he is guilty, or not, You've provide proof who you really are. Cause truly, if you kept showing up to this location with your child, and receiving all of this information, then you're no good as a parent yourself. If you feel it isn't a safe haven then stay home, or go to another martial arts school. There are a lot of them out there. Hopefully you can do a back ground check on the next one. Just a suggestion not a sermon.
Jason W
1:51 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Reminds me of when Ward Edmonds from Springfield was busted for chasing jail bait during his Congressional campaign. The charges proved to be bogus.
aconcernedparent
12:08 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
4 Runner: thanks. I am, fortunately, not a parent at this place but was considering to move here. Did get to meet him on few occasions. Perhaps no one knew such a "creepy" behavior existed within this group of people who respect and expect high performance by our little kids. My only concerns (if any) is he continues to teach it to kids.....double face...
john e law
1:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Oct 15 trial date
Le’s conditions for release:
• "Not to engage in teaching of minors without adult present."
• "No contact with victims/victims mother."
• "May not leave the Commonwealth of Virginia."
Indicted on 3 counts possession of child pornography.
"On or about the October 26, 2011, Le did unlawfully and feloniously, knowingly or intentionally possess sexually explicit visual material utilizing or having as a subject a person less than (18) years of age."
Indicted on 4 counts of "indecent act with/child by parent."
"On or between May 1, 2003, and May 31, 2003, Le, a person over the age of (18) years, did unlawfully and feloniously sexually abuse [child a] a child (16) years of age, whom Le maintained a custodial or supervisory relationship."
"On or between June 29, 2004, and July 30, 2004, Le, a person over the age of (18) years, did unlawfully and feloniously sexually abuse [child a] a child (17) years of age, whom Le maintained a custodial or supervisory relationship."
"On or between January 1, 2005, and January 31, 2005, Le, a person over the age of (18) years, did unlawfully and feloniously sexually abuse [child a] a child (17) years of age, whom Le maintained a custodial or supervisory relationship."
"On or between September 1, 2008, and November 1, 2008, Le, a person over the age of (18) years, did unlawfully and feloniously sexually abuse [child b] a child (17) years of age, whom Le maintained a custodial or supervisory relationship."