.

Kaine, Moran, Connolly: Sequestration Means Longer Airport Security Lines, Fewer Flights

Sequestration could affect every traveler at airports nationwide, say U.S. Reps. Jim Moran, Gerry Connolly and U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine speaking from Reagan National Airport Monday.

Federal sequestration could mean fewer flights and increased wait times at airports, Virginia lawmakers said Monday.

Further, it threatens to close small- to mid-sized airports across the country.

The massive, indiscriminate spending cuts Congress put in motion to force a budget compromise would cut $600 million from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) if they go into effect Friday.

Jobs on the Line

Under sequestration, the FAA would have to furlough employees for 11 days — with as much as 10 percent of its workforce furloughed on any given day — and the agency would be unable to hire replacements for the 30 percent of its workers eligible to retire.

Up to 2,200 air traffic controllers would be furloughed, forcing airports to reduce the number of flights coming and going. Beyond that, $136 million would be eliminated from an air traffic control modernization fund and as many as 1,480 ongoing aircraft and parts manufacturing projects would be in jeopardy.

Further, sequestration would eliminate 2,750 customs officers and 5,000 border patrol agents. Customs and Border Patrol employees would see up to 14 furlough days, causing wait times at the busiest airports to exceed three hours and thousands of passengers to miss connecting flights, according to a fact sheet put together by the offices of U.S. Reps. Jim MoranGerry Connolly and U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine.

'The Impact of Sequestration Cannot be Underestimated'

"Let's be clear that this is not a theoretical issue," Capt. Sean Cassidy, first vice president of the Air Line Pilots Association International, said at a news conference at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Monday.

"The impact of sequestration cannot be underestimated, because at the very time many of our passengers are contemplating their next business trip or family vacation, our pilots are looking at a future in which they will have no other choice than to leave those passengers stringed at the gate."

"My optimism meter is higher than my confidence meter," Kaine said about reaching a compromise this week. "Conceptually, it's not difficult to do. If we can agree on a balanced approach, we can negotiate the cuts."

If Congress cannot agree on an alternative, the $1.2 trillion in cuts would begin to go into effect on Friday. The first $85 billion would be cut from the current budget year, which started Oct. 1.

Kaine would like to see lawmakers agree on targeted cuts and revenue adjustments to account for that $85 billion, and then make future cuts part of the normal budgeting process.

Moran and Connolly were downright pessimistic.

"It's going to happen, and it's going to happen on Friday," Moran told Patch.

"This isn't crying wolf," Connolly said. "This is real."

The lawmakers were joined by the pilots association along with representatives of trade groups for aviation safety specialists, federal employees and the travel industry.

Broader and International Economic Effects

Commercial aviation makes up 5 percent of this country's gross domestic product, Cassidy said.

The ripple effect of fewer business and vacation flights will be felt in communities across the country, said Geoff Freeman, chief operating officer of the U.S. Travel Association. That means less money will be spent in restaurants, grocery stores and hotels by travelers.

"Their wallets become a little looser when they're on the road," Freeman said.

The association has launched a campaign where people can text "DELAYED" to 877-877 and be connected to the office of their congressman. 

Moran and Connolly expressed frustration with House members determined to see spending cuts and, as Connolly put it, "consequences be damned."

"The aviation industry is labor intensive," Moran said. "This will show the American public how important the federal government is."

Moran and Connolly said people should continue to buy plane tickets, but be prepared to get to the airport earlier and wait longer for trips after Friday.

Half of the sequestration cuts would affect defense and military spending; the rest, domestic spending such as aviation and education.

Read more:

McDonnell: Sequester Could Force Virginia Into a Recession

Kaine: Sequestration to Affect Education Funding in Virginia

Defense Contractors: 'We've Been Sequestered Already'

Cara February 26, 2013 at 04:12 PM
Barry Meuse, great comment -- you articulated exactly what most people are thinking -- this is so trumped up....only in the US would politicians gather together and basically say, you elected us but we cannot do our jobs -- and that is why sequestration is happening is because these guys love pork so much, they cannot cut anything.
Anna Barcroft February 26, 2013 at 06:48 PM
Tom Kaine, Gerry Connolly, Jim Moran are on the right track! Sequestration is the wrong measure, do not under estimate it's potential impact. No elected government leaders Democrat or Republican want this to happen, so why would would any clear thinking citizen support this? It's exceptionally reckless to make across the board cuts to the entire government with out analyzing priorities and effects. It amazes me that any one who lives in this area would think that this is no big deal. If sequestration were to last for any significant amount of time you would start to see significant changes in the landscape. The first things to go on a crumbling family budget are dinning out and new cars. Think in terms of empty retail spaces and more shrinking home values. The people living exurbs and outer suburbs would probably see it first. In a few short years we could be like a Detroit only the rot would start at the exterior, the communities that are outside the beltway will be the first to suffer.
Fizban February 26, 2013 at 07:24 PM
Yet we borrow trillions so we can give billions in foreign aid ?. That needs to stop. The the buck needs to stop at American borders. Americans need that money
Dave Fuller February 27, 2013 at 09:57 PM
I wouldn't mind getting rid of the TSA. Do you really think you're any safer? I flew a couple of times in Australia and never had to take my shoes off or stand in crappy lines. It was great, and nobody blew the plane up.
Seriously? March 01, 2013 at 02:42 PM
Sequestration has happened. The sun still came up. My coffee still brewed. Maybe the world isn't really going to end after all?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something